2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2006 Nissan M
To start off, both 2006 Ford Ranger and 2006 Nissan M were released in the same year (2006). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 4,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Nissan M is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan M, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan M (462 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (257 Nm). This means 2006 Nissan M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger. 2006 Nissan M has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2006 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Nissan M will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2006 Nissan M | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ranger | M |
Year Released | 2006 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 4500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 257 Nm | 462 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |