2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2006 Pontiac SV 6
To start off, both 2006 Ford Ranger and 2006 Pontiac SV 6 were released in the same year (2006). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Pontiac SV 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Pontiac SV 6 (196 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (149 HP @ 4900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Pontiac SV 6 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Pontiac SV 6 (289 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 2006 Pontiac SV 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2006 Pontiac SV 6 | |
Make | Ford | Pontiac |
Model | Ranger | SV 6 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 196 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 289 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3080 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 95 L |