2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2006 Rover 45
To start off, both 2006 Ford Ranger and 2006 Rover 45 were released in the same year (2006). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 2006 Rover 45. (100 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2006 Rover 45.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Rover 45. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 45. (240 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 45.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2006 Rover 45 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Ranger | 45 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 88.9 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 55 L |