2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2009 Lada 21
To start off, 2009 Lada 21 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP) has 126 more horse power than 2009 Lada 21. (80 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2009 Lada 21.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Lada 21. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lada 21. (120 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lada 21.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 2009 Lada 21 | |
| Make | Ford | Lada |
| Model | Ranger | 21 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 80 HP |
| Torque | 324 Nm | 120 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 43 L |
