2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2010 BMW 123
To start off, 2010 BMW 123 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2010 BMW 123. (202 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2010 BMW 123.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 BMW 123. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW 123 (400 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 BMW 123 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2010 BMW 123 | |
Make | Ford | BMW |
Model | Ranger | 123 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4239 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1748 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1421 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 51 L |