2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP) has 76 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Ranger | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2490 mm |