2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (207 HP) has 54 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (323 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 2010 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Ranger | Epica |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4014 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 207 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 323 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
