2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2010 Honda Fit
To start off, 2010 Honda Fit is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2010 Honda Fit. (117 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2010 Honda Fit.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Honda Fit. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Honda Fit. (144 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Honda Fit.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2010 Honda Fit | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Ranger | Fit |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 117 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4105 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1524 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2499 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 40 L |