2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2010 Kia Forte

To start off, 2010 Kia Forte is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2010 Kia Forte. (156 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2010 Kia Forte.

Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Kia Forte. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Kia Forte. (195 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Kia Forte.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Ford Ranger 2010 Kia Forte
Make Ford Kia
Model Ranger Forte
Year Released 2006 2010
Body Type Pickup Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4016 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 206 HP 156 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 324 Nm 195 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4300 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 5150 mm 4481 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1765 mm
Vehicle Height 1780 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 3010 mm 2649 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 84 L 52 L