2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2010 Lada Kalina
To start off, 2010 Lada Kalina is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2010 Lada Kalina. (58 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2010 Lada Kalina.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Lada Kalina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Lada Kalina. (120 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Lada Kalina.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2010 Lada Kalina | |
Make | Ford | Lada |
Model | Ranger | Kalina |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2299 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 58 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 50 L |