2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2010 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 207 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP) has 54 more horse power than 2010 Peugeot 207. (152 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2010 Peugeot 207.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Peugeot 207. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 2010 Peugeot 207 | |
| Make | Ford | Peugeot |
| Model | Ranger | 207 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4016 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 152 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4044 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1972 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1397 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 50 L |
