2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet
To start off, 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet (336 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2011 Nissan Murano CrossCabriolet | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ranger | Murano CrossCabriolet |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 336 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4829 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1681 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2824 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 82 L |