2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2012 Holden Captiva

To start off, 2012 Holden Captiva is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2012 Holden Captiva. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Captiva.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Captiva. (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Captiva.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Ford Ranger 2012 Holden Captiva
Make Ford Holden
Model Ranger Captiva
Year Released 2006 2012
Body Type Pickup SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4016 cc 1990 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 206 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 324 Nm 320 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 100.4 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84.4 mm 92 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 5150 mm 4580 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1780 mm 1710 mm
Wheelbase Size 3010 mm 2710 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 84 L 65 L