2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero

To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero (163 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (86 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1322 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero.

Because 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero (373 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (174 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger. 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2006 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Ford Ranger 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero
Make Ford Mitsubishi
Model Ranger Pajero
Year Released 2006 2012
Body Type Pickup SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2499 cc 3199 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 3 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 86 HP 163 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 3500 RPM
Torque 174 Nm 373 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 21.6:1 17.0:1
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2862 kg 1540 kg
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 4910 mm
Vehicle Height 2120 mm 1880 mm
Wheelbase Size 2990 mm 2790 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.8 L/100km 10.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L 88 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]