2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2012 Volvo S60

To start off, 2012 Volvo S60 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Volvo S60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo S60 (3,200 Nm) has 2876 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (324 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger. 2012 Volvo S60 has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2006 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo S60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Ford Ranger 2012 Volvo S60
Make Ford Volvo
Model Ranger S60
Year Released 2006 2012
Body Type Pickup Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4016 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 206 HP 0 HP
Torque 324 Nm 3200 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed shiftable automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 5150 mm 4628 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1864 mm
Vehicle Height 1780 mm 1483 mm
Wheelbase Size 3010 mm 2776 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 84 L 67 L