2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2013 Honda Fit
To start off, 2013 Honda Fit is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2013 Honda Fit. (115 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2013 Honda Fit. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 63 kg more than 2013 Honda Fit. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Honda Fit. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (323 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Honda Fit. (144 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Honda Fit.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2013 Honda Fit | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Ranger | Fit |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4014 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 323 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.4 : 1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4105 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1525 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 40 L |