2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Ranger would be higher.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mini Countryman. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Ford | Mini |
| Model | Ranger | Countryman |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 85 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1561 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 47 L |
