2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Ranger would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 330 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mini Countryman. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Ford | Mini |
Model | Ranger | Countryman |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 47 L |