2006 Ford Ranger vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford Ranger would be higher.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 396 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2006 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Ranger | Phantom |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5350 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 720 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 8-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 5612 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1987 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1598 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 100 L |