2006 Ford S-Max vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 2006 Ford S-Max is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford S-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford S-Max (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford S-Max should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Because 1974 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford S-Max, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford S-Max (185 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2006 Ford S-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford S-Max | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | S-Max | 140 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 185 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2620 mm |