2006 Ford S-Max vs. 2000 Vector RD 180
To start off, 2006 Ford S-Max is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Vector RD 180. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Vector RD 180 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford S-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Vector RD 180 (180 HP) has 51 more horse power than 2006 Ford S-Max. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Vector RD 180 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford S-Max.
Because 2000 Vector RD 180 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Vector RD 180. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford S-Max, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford S-Max (320 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Vector RD 180. (175 Nm). This means 2006 Ford S-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Vector RD 180.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford S-Max | 2000 Vector RD 180 | |
Make | Ford | Vector |
Model | S-Max | RD 180 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 175 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 81.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 88.9 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2390 mm |