2006 Ford Territory vs. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2006 Ford Territory is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 520 kg more than 2006 Ford Territory.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Territory | 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Territory | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3983 cc | 6750 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 244 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1715 kg | 2235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3060 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 107 L |
