2006 GMC Canyon vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2006 GMC Canyon is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,770 cc, 2006 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Canyon (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 GMC Canyon weights approximately 865 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Canyon (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (96 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Canyon | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | GMC | Nissan |
Model | Canyon | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1270 cc |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 96 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2420 mm |