2006 GMC Canyon vs. 1992 Mazda 626
To start off, 2006 GMC Canyon is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,770 cc, 2006 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Canyon (175 HP) has 69 more horse power than 1992 Mazda 626. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 GMC Canyon weights approximately 550 kg more than 1992 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Canyon (251 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda 626. (157 Nm). This means 2006 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Canyon | 1992 Mazda 626 | |
Make | GMC | Mazda |
Model | Canyon | 626 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1840 cc |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 157 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2620 mm |