2006 GMC Canyon vs. 1995 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2006 GMC Canyon is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Land Rover Range Rover (223 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2006 GMC Canyon. (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2006 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 GMC Canyon weights approximately 357 kg more than 1995 Land Rover Range Rover.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Land Rover Range Rover (381 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 GMC Canyon. (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1995 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Canyon | 1995 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | GMC | Land Rover |
Model | Canyon | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 4554 cc |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 223 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 381 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2577 kg | 2220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2750 mm |