2006 GMC Canyon vs. 2003 Peugeot 407
To start off, 2006 GMC Canyon is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Peugeot 407. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Peugeot 407 would be higher. At 2,944 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Peugeot 407 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Peugeot 407 (207 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2006 GMC Canyon. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Peugeot 407 should accelerate faster than 2006 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 GMC Canyon weights approximately 937 kg more than 2003 Peugeot 407.
Because 2006 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Peugeot 407. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Peugeot 407 (290 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 GMC Canyon. (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2003 Peugeot 407 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Canyon | 2003 Peugeot 407 | |
Make | GMC | Peugeot |
Model | Canyon | 407 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 2944 cc |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 290 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2577 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 14.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 45 L |