2006 GMC Canyon vs. 2004 GMC Safari
To start off, 2006 GMC Canyon is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Safari would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Safari (190 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2006 GMC Canyon. (175 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 2006 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 GMC Canyon weights approximately 577 kg more than 2004 GMC Safari.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Safari (339 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 GMC Canyon. (251 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Canyon | 2004 GMC Safari | |
Make | GMC | GMC |
Model | Canyon | Safari |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2768 cc | 4293 cc |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 339 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2659 kg | 2082 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 102 L |