2006 GMC Canyon vs. 2009 BMW 120
To start off, 2009 BMW 120 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 2,770 cc, 2006 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 175 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 GMC Canyon weights approximately 1137 kg more than 2009 BMW 120.
Because 2006 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 BMW 120. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 120 (351 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 GMC Canyon. (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 120 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Canyon | 2009 BMW 120 | |
Make | GMC | BMW |
Model | Canyon | 120 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1995 cc |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 351 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2577 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 4.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 51 L |