2006 GMC Canyon vs. 2009 Volvo V70
To start off, 2009 Volvo V70 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volvo V70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo V70 (232 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2006 GMC Canyon. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo V70 should accelerate faster than 2006 GMC Canyon.
Because 2006 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Volvo V70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Canyon (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo V70. (236 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo V70.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Canyon | 2009 Volvo V70 | |
Make | GMC | Volvo |
Model | Canyon | V70 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 3192 cc |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.9 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.9 L/100km | 14.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 60 L |