2006 GMC Canyon vs. 2010 BMW 528
To start off, 2010 BMW 528 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 3,458 cc, 2006 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 528 (230 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2006 GMC Canyon. (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 528 should accelerate faster than 2006 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 GMC Canyon weights approximately 912 kg more than 2010 BMW 528.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Canyon (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 BMW 528. (271 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2006 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 BMW 528.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Canyon | 2010 BMW 528 | |
Make | GMC | BMW |
Model | Canyon | 528 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 3000 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2577 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4854 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1847 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1481 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2888 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 70 L |