2006 GMC Canyon vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 2,770 cc, 2006 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 12 more horse power than 2006 GMC Canyon. (175 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2006 GMC Canyon.
Because 2006 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 GMC Canyon. (251 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Canyon | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | GMC | Jaguar |
Model | Canyon | XF |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 2200 cc |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 450 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 70 L |