2006 GMC Canyon vs. 2011 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2011 Nissan Rogue is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 2,770 cc, 2006 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Canyon (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Rogue. (170 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Rogue.
Because 2006 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Nissan Rogue. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Canyon (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Rogue. (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Rogue.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Canyon | 2011 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | GMC | Nissan |
Model | Canyon | Rogue |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 2500 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4681 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1659 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 60 L |