2006 GMC Canyon vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 3,458 cc, 2006 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Canyon (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 3. (148 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 3.
Because 2006 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 3 (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 GMC Canyon. (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Canyon | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
Make | GMC | Mazda |
Model | Canyon | 3 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 2184 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 55 L |