2006 GMC Canyon vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 2,770 cc, 2006 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Canyon (175 HP) has 74 more horse power than 2012 Volvo C30. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 2012 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 GMC Canyon weights approximately 984 kg more than 2012 Volvo C30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Canyon | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | GMC | Volvo |
Model | Canyon | C30 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1600 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 101 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2435 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 60 L |