2006 GMC Canyon vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Canyon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 GMC Canyon weights approximately 1839 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Because 2006 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Smart Fortwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Canyon (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 GMC Canyon | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | GMC | Smart |
| Model | Canyon | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2659 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 1867 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 33 L |
