2006 GMC Canyon vs. 2013 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC90 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC90 (237 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2006 GMC Canyon. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2006 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 GMC Canyon weights approximately 417 kg more than 2013 Volvo XC90.
Because 2006 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Volvo XC90. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 GMC Canyon. (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Canyon | 2013 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | GMC | Volvo |
Model | Canyon | XC90 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 3200 cc |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2577 kg | 2160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4807 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1784 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2857 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.4 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.2 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |