2006 GMC Envoy vs. 1962 Zastava 750
To start off, 2006 GMC Envoy is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 4,162 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 GMC Envoy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Envoy (291 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 267 more horse power than 1962 Zastava 750. (24 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Envoy should accelerate faster than 1962 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 GMC Envoy weights approximately 1972 kg more than 1962 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 GMC Envoy is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Zastava 750. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Envoy will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Envoy (376 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 330 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Zastava 750. (46 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 GMC Envoy will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Envoy | 1962 Zastava 750 | |
Make | GMC | Zastava |
Model | Envoy | 750 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
Engine Size | 4162 cc | 766 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 291 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 376 Nm | 46 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2577 kg | 605 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2010 mm |