2006 GMC Envoy vs. 2013 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XK is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Envoy. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Envoy would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XK (503 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 2006 GMC Envoy. (291 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2006 GMC Envoy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 GMC Envoy weights approximately 859 kg more than 2013 Jaguar XK.
Because 2006 GMC Envoy is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Envoy will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XK (625 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 GMC Envoy. (376 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 GMC Envoy.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Envoy | 2013 Jaguar XK | |
Make | GMC | Jaguar |
Model | Envoy | XK |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 291 HP | 503 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 376 Nm | 625 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2659 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4794 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2032 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1322 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2752 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 14.1 L/100km |