2006 GMC Envoy vs. 2013 Lincoln MKS
To start off, 2013 Lincoln MKS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Envoy. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Envoy would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 GMC Envoy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Lincoln MKS (301 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2006 GMC Envoy. (292 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln MKS should accelerate faster than 2006 GMC Envoy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 GMC Envoy weights approximately 519 kg more than 2013 Lincoln MKS.
Because 2006 GMC Envoy is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Lincoln MKS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Envoy will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lincoln MKS (380 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 GMC Envoy. (376 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2013 Lincoln MKS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 GMC Envoy.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Envoy | 2013 Lincoln MKS | |
Make | GMC | Lincoln |
Model | Envoy | MKS |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 292 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 376 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2435 kg | 1916 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 5222 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2172 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1565 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2868 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 11.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 72 L |