2006 GMC Savana vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2006 GMC Savana is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 5,324 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Savana (295 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Savana should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 GMC Savana weights approximately 1257 kg more than 1952 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Savana (454 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Savana | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
Make | GMC | Triumph |
Model | Savana | Renown |
Year Released | 2006 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5324 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 454 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2537 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2750 mm |