2006 GMC Savana vs. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 2006 GMC Savana is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 GMC Savana weights approximately 717 kg more than 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire.
Because 2006 GMC Savana is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Savana will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 GMC Savana | 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | GMC | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Savana | Starfire |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5324 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 295 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2537 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 60 L |
