2006 GMC Savana vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Savana would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Savana (195 HP) has 18 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Savana should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 2006 GMC Savana is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Savana will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Savana (353 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm). This means 2006 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 GMC Savana | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | GMC | Ford |
| Model | Savana | E-350 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Van | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4294 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 177 HP |
| Torque | 353 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4437 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2619 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.5 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.8 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 57 L |
