2006 GMC Savana vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Savana would be higher. At 5,963 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Savana (300 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2010 Holden Calais. (278 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Savana should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Calais.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Savana (488 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Calais. (350 Nm). This means 2006 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Calais.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 GMC Savana | 2010 Holden Calais | |
| Make | GMC | Holden |
| Model | Savana | Calais |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Van | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5963 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 488 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 12 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
