2006 GMC Savana vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Savana would be higher. At 4,802 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Savana (285 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2010 Renault Megane. (227 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Savana should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Megane.
Because 2006 GMC Savana is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 GMC Savana. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Savana (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Megane. (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Savana | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | GMC | Renault |
Model | Savana | Megane |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4802 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 6210 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3940 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 60 L |