2006 GMC Savana vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Savana would be higher. At 5,963 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Savana (300 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Savana should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 3.
Because 2006 GMC Savana is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 GMC Savana. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Savana (488 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Savana | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
Make | GMC | Mazda |
Model | Savana | 3 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5963 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 488 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 12 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 6210 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2090 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3940 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 55 L |