2006 GMC Sierra vs. 1981 Zastava 2101
To start off, 2006 GMC Sierra is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Sierra (195 HP) has 133 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 2101. (62 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 2101.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Sierra (354 Nm) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm). This means 2006 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 2101. 2006 GMC Sierra has automatic transmission and 1981 Zastava 2101 has manual transmission. 1981 Zastava 2101 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 GMC Sierra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 GMC Sierra | 1981 Zastava 2101 | |
| Make | GMC | Zastava |
| Model | Sierra | 2101 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 62 HP |
| Torque | 354 Nm | 87 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5850 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 2430 mm |
