2006 GMC Sierra vs. 2000 Lotus Extreme
To start off, 2006 GMC Sierra is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotus Extreme. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotus Extreme would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Sierra (195 HP) has 75 more horse power than 2000 Lotus Extreme. (120 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Sierra (354 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus Extreme. (180 Nm). This means 2006 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus Extreme. 2006 GMC Sierra has automatic transmission and 2000 Lotus Extreme has manual transmission. 2000 Lotus Extreme will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 GMC Sierra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 GMC Sierra | 2000 Lotus Extreme | |
| Make | GMC | Lotus |
| Model | Sierra | Extreme |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4294 cc | 700 cc |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 120 HP |
| Torque | 354 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5850 mm | 3510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 2420 mm |
