2006 GMC Sierra vs. 2004 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2006 GMC Sierra is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Lincoln LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Lincoln LS would be higher. At 5,358 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Sierra (295 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2004 Lincoln LS. (280 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2004 Lincoln LS.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Sierra (454 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Lincoln LS. (388 Nm). This means 2006 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Lincoln LS.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Sierra | 2004 Lincoln LS | |
Make | GMC | Lincoln |
Model | Sierra | LS |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5358 cc | 3933 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 280 HP |
Torque | 454 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5850 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 68 L |