2006 GMC Sierra vs. 2004 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 GMC Sierra is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 5,358 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Sierra (295 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 3. (160 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 3.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Sierra (454 Nm) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 3. (203 Nm). This means 2006 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Sierra | 2004 Mazda 3 | |
Make | GMC | Mazda |
Model | Sierra | 3 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5358 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 454 Nm | 203 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5850 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 55 L |