2006 GMC Sierra vs. 2009 Maybach 62
To start off, 2009 Maybach 62 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 5,513 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Maybach 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Maybach 62 (543 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 248 more horse power than 2006 GMC Sierra. (295 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Maybach 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 GMC Sierra.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Maybach 62 (900 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 446 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 GMC Sierra. (454 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Maybach 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 GMC Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
2006 GMC Sierra | 2009 Maybach 62 | |
Make | GMC | Maybach |
Model | Sierra | 62 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5358 cc | 5513 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 543 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 454 Nm | 900 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5850 mm | 6170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 3830 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.2 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 23.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 15.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 110 L |